Differing definitions of drug abuse are used in public health, medical and criminal justice contexts. Using a multicriteria decision analysis approach where different harm criteria, for example, acute overdose, injury, family adversity were weighted relative to their importance, alcohol was ranked as the most harmful drug overall. The idea behind the scale is that qualitative methodology, such as the delphi method which entails consulting experts separately to rate drug harms without disclosing the identity of the expert pool in the process and consensus. Toward an improved multicriteria drug harm assessment. Alcohol most harmful drug based on multicriteria analysis. Method members of the independent scientific committee on drugs, including two invited specialists, met in a 1day interactive workshop to score 20 drugs on.
While there is a growing literature on the categorization and analysis of drug. Frontiers toward an improved multicriteria drug harm. We aimed to apply multicriteria decision analysis mcda modelling to a range of drug harms in the uk. The multicriteria drug harm scale mcdhs has been proposed as a solution to this problem nutt et al. To do this, the research team used a technique called a multicriteria decision analysis mcda. Owing in part to criticism over the arbitrary weighting of the factors in the 2007 study, the new study employed a multiplecriteria decision analysis procedure and found that alcohol is more harmful to society than both heroin and crack, while heroin, crack, and methamphetamine are the most harmful drugs to individuals. This approach could provide a basis for exploring and formulating recommendations to ministers as part of the structure of acmd reports. For example, in the paper that prompted the caulkins et al. The new analysis uses nine criteria that relate to the harms that a drug produces in the individual and seven to the harms to others both in the uk and overseas. Drug harms in the uk articles drug harms in the uk a. Forty drug experts from throughout the eu scored 20 drugs on 16 harm criteria. Method members of the independent scientific committee on drugs. Multicriteria decision analysis of drug harms in the uk and.
The report concluded that ecigarettes are 95% less harmful than conventional cigarettes, advice which was subsequently used in a report by public. Mcda modelling showed that heroin, crack cocaine, and metamfetamine were the most harmful drugs to individuals part scores 34, 37, and 32, respectively, whereas alcohol, heroin, and crack cocaine were the most harmful to others 46, 21, and 17, respectively. Drug harmfulness is the degree to which a psychoactive drug is harmful to a user and is measured in various ways, such as by addictiveness and the potential for physical harm. A new approach to formulating and appraising drug policy. Pdf substance use communication between looked after. The acmd has explored the use of a multicriteria decision analysis mcda model for evaluating drug harms. Background proper assessment of the harms caused by the misuse of drugs can inform policy makers in health, policing, and social care. Participants collectively defined regulatory regimes and identified outcome criteria reflecting ethical and normative concerns. Union eu drug experts using the multicriteria decision analysis model for. Alcohol most harmful drug, according to multicriteria.
Multicriteria decision analysis technique and their properties. Alcohol most harmful drug, according to multicriteria analysis. This task is not easy because of the wide range of ways in which drugs can cause harm. Using a similar multicriteria decision analysis process as the 2010 drug harm ranking, drugscience looked to rank the harms of all nicotinecontaining products, including cigarettes, cigars, nicotine patches and ecigarettes. David j nutt, leslie a king, lawrence d phillips, on behalf of the independent scientific. Unfortunately, in many cases, the harms of criminalization of drug users substantially exceeds the harms from the drug use itself. Until 2009, he was a professor at the university of bristol heading their psychopharmacology unit. Pdf substance use communication between looked after young. They obviously exist, otherwise drug use would be far more rare than it is. More harmful drugs are called hard drugs 1, and less harmful drugs are called soft drugs. The aim of this study was to obtain a comprehensive consensus from addiction experts in scotland on the relative harms of drug misuse, both legal and illegal using the ranking system developed by nutt et al. Since then he has been the edmond j safra chair in neuropsychopharmacology at imperial college london and. Phillips, on behalf of the independent scientific committee on drugs medicine. Drug related deaths in england and walesthat is, those with an underlying cause of drug misuse, dependence, or poisoningare running at a record 3674 a year, with 2479 related to illegal drug use alone.
European rating of drug harms jan van amsterdam, david. According to the national survey of drug use and health nsduh, between 2002 and 2017, prioryear marijuana use rates increased from 2. David john nutt born 16 april 1951 is an english neuropsychopharmacologist specialising in the research of drugs that affect the brain and conditions such as addiction, anxiety, and sleep. Multicriteria decision analysis the new analysis uses nine criteria that relate to the harms that a drug produces in the individual and seven to the harms to others both in the uk and overseas. As with all alcohol and other drug use, taking mdma carries risks, albeit comparatively lower than most other drugs.
Nov 06, 2010 we aimed to apply multicriteria decision analysis mcda modelling to a range of drug harms in the uk. Marijuana acceptance and use among older adults are increasing. Methods members of the independent scientific committee on drugs, including two invited specialists, met in a 1day interactive workshop to score 20 drugs on 16 criteria. Substance abuse, also known as drug abuse, is use of a drug in amounts or by methods which are harmful to the individual or others.
The most comprehensive work quantifying drug harms was conducted by nutt et al 1 2 in the uk. Nov 01, 2010 multicriteria decision analysis the new analysis uses nine criteria that relate to the harms that a drug produces in the individual and seven to the harms to others both in the uk and overseas. Drugs that cause most harm scoring drugs graphic detail. In some cases criminal or antisocial behaviour occurs when the person is under the influence of a drug, and long term. Questioning the method and utility of ranking drug harms in drug policy.
Multicriteria decision analysis of drug harms in the uk. Article information, pdf download for european rating of drug harms, open. These harms are clustered into five subgroups representing physical, psychological, and social harms. Members of the independent scientific committee on drugs, including two invited specialists, met in a 1day interactive workshop to score 20 drugs on 16 criteria. The initial multicriteria drug harm scale proposal.
More harmful drugs are called hard drugs, and less harmful drugs are called soft drugs. The term soft drug is considered controversial by its critics as it may imply that soft drugs cause no or insignificant harm. To provide better guidance to policy makers in health, policing, and social care, the harms that drugs cause need to be properly assessed. Method members of the independent scientific committee on drugs, including two invited specialists, met in a 1day interactive workshop to score 20 drugs on 16 criteria. We also argued for a more sophisticated analysis in which drug benefits would also be taken into account. This cited by count includes citations to the following articles in scholar. Members of the independent scientific committee on drugs, including two invited specialists, met in a 1day interactive. Will growth in cryptomarket drug buying increase the harms. How changes to drug prohibition could be good for the uk.
The model provides a conceptual framework for further consideration and refinement. Proper assessment of the harms caused by the misuse of drugs can inform policy makers in health, policing, and social care. Harms to the consumer mortalit y risk of lethal overdose drugspeci. Quantifying the rr of harm to self and others from. We aimed to apply multicriteria decision analysis mcda modelling to a. This creates a unique ratio scale for each criterion. The researchers say that it is important for policy makers in health, policing and social care to have good guidance on the harms of drugs. The australian drug harms ranking study yvonne bonomo. A multicriteria decision analysis the iscds first published work, launched in the lancet on 1 november 2010, has. Europe 20 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 0 20 40 60 80 europe uk r 0. Aug 20, 2018 the initial multicriteria drug harm scale proposal. Will growth in cryptomarket drug buying increase the harms of. Potential harms of marijuana use among older adults.
Longterm effects of ecstasy are still under investigation. An alternative multicriteria decision analysis proposed by nutt et al 2007. David j nutt, leslie a king, lawrence d phillips, on behalf of the independent scienti. Some researchers suggest that slight brain changes may result from heavy use, but the evidence is far from conclusive. The ones marked may be different from the article in the profile. As with all alcohol and other drug use, taking mdma.
The expert group also assessed criteria weights that would apply, on average, across the eu. Multicriteria decision analysis is a technique that uses decision matrix to provide a systematic analytical approach for establishing criteria, such as risk levels, uncertainty, and valuation, to evaluate and rank many ideas. Swingweights equate the units of harm on all the criteria. European rating of drug harms jan van amsterdam, david nutt. The present paper describes the results of a rating study performed by a group of european union eu drug experts using the multicriteria decision analysis model for evaluating drug harms. Overall, alcohol was the most harmful drug overall harm score 72, with heroin 55 and crack cocaine 54 in second and third places. Experts on drug harms, addiction, criminology and drug policy were invited to a decision conference to develop a multicriterion decision analysis mcda model for appraising alternative regulatory regimes.
339 712 123 1385 561 1430 1454 1010 272 793 1003 203 1333 854 795 308 506 1392 1216 1330 589 392 365 1287 1266 1119 435 235 1260 1158 750 1309 1381 924 691 645 352 1323 634 1233 1146 1130 187 90 14 578 913